ShareThis Page
Union: Construction tax fraud costs governments $450B annually | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Union: Construction tax fraud costs governments $450B annually

Bob Bauder
1026930_web1_Tax-Fraud
Bob Bauder | Tribune-Review
Members of the Keystone Mountain Lakes Regional Council of Carpenters wait at Market Square in Downtown Pittsburgh on Monday, April 15, 2019, for the start of a union rally aimed at eliminating tax fraud in the construction industry. Members of the Keystone Mountain Lakes Regional Council of Carpenters wait at Market Square in Downtown Pittsburgh on Monday, April 15, 2019, for the start of a union rally aimed at eliminating tax fraud in the construction industry.

Several hundred carpenters’ union members and public officials rallied Monday in Downtown Pittsburgh to call for an end to construction industry fraud.

Union officials said unscrupulous contractors and labor brokers rob the public of federal and local tax revenue by paying workers cash “under the table,” misclassifying them as independent contractors and failing to pay such benefits as workman’s compensation and unemployment.

The fraud costs local governments across the United States an estimated $450 billion annually in lost tax revenue, officials said.

“When you talk about tax fraud, it’s about people that are cheating,” said Bill Waterkotte, eastern district vice president of the Keystone Mountain Lakes Regional Council of Carpenters. “They’re not paying taxes. They’re paying cash. Four hundred and fifty billion (dollars), in evading taxes. That could go to building our roads and bridges, our schools, our veterans, helping the people who need help, and they’re stealing it.”

The union estimates fraud costs Pennsylvania governments about $200 million each year, but offered no specifics for the Pittsburgh region.

Elected officials including Allegheny County Executive Rich Fitzgerald, Pittsburgh Mayor Bill Peduto, U.S. Rep. Mike Doyle, D-Forest Hills, and several state senators said they support stiffening workplace rules to help eliminate fraud.

Pittsburgh City Council late last year approved a resolution proposed by Councilman Corey O’Connor that created a task force to investigate the issue. O’Connor said the members plan to offer future legislative remedies to council and the mayor.

O’Connor of Swisshelm Park said the region has about 60,000 people employed in the construction industry.

“We are going to go after those bad workers, those people that take our tax money, that take your jobs because subcontractors and contractors are undercutting city bids. We have to stop that,” O’Connor said.

O’Connor said contractors who skirt taxes and pay workers less can submit lower bids because employment costs are lower than companies that follow the law.

Peduto noted that he issued an executive order last year requiring the city to enter into project labor agreements with contractors and subcontractors on any city project exceeding $500,000. He said the city requires contractors to pay all workers prevailing wages.

“In the city of Pittsburgh, we worked together with the building trades in order to create an historic labor agreement that in any of the major projects we undertake people will never be at the part of the negotiation to be paid less than what a union wage is,” the mayor said. “We need to make that same law into effect throughout the state and throughout this country.”

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Bob at 412-765-2312, bbauder@tribweb.com or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.