Vandals deface memorial to slain Pittsburgh officer Paul Sciullo II at parents’ home |

Vandals deface memorial to slain Pittsburgh officer Paul Sciullo II at parents’ home

Megan Guza
Nate Smallwood | Tribune-Review
Paul ‘Max’ Sciullo and Sue Sciullo, mother and father of slain Pittsburgh police Officer Paul J. Sciullo II, pose for a portrait outside of their Bloomfield home on Friday, March 29, 2019.

Vandals defaced a memorial plaque outside the home of Sue and Max Sciullo, parents of slain Pittsburgh police officer Paul Sciullo II, authorities said Monday.

The plaque memorializing their son, killed alongside two fellow officers in an ambush in Stanton Heights in 2009, is affixed to a railing on the Sciullo’s porch. Someone spray painted over it, authorities said.

Chief Scott Schubert said he was saddened to hear of the vandalism.

“It’s a shame that Paul gave his life protecting the City of Pittsburgh with his brother officers 10 years ago, to have somebody deface his memorial at the home of his parents, the son who they grieve every day,” he said.

Police are investigating.

The Sciullos told officers – who still drive past their Bloomfield home to check in on the couple – that they were hurt by the damage to the son’s memory, according to Public Safety spokeswoman Cara Cruz, and officers helped clean the plaque.

Anyone with information on the vandalism is asked to call Zone 5 police at 412-665-3605.

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 412-380-8519, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.