W.Va. woman caught with loaded handgun at Pittsburgh airport | TribLIVE.com

W.Va. woman caught with loaded handgun at Pittsburgh airport

Megan Guza
Transportation Security Administration officials confiscated a 9mm handgun from a West Virginia woman at Pittsburgh International Airport on Wednesday, March 27, 2019.

A West Virginia woman tried taking a loaded gun through security at Pittsburgh International Airport on Wednesday, according to Transportation Security Administration officials.

The woman, from Monongalia County, had the 9mm handgun in her backpack, said TSA spokeswoman Lisa Farbstein. The gun was loaded with seven rounds, including one in the chamber.

Allegheny County Police responded to the checkpoint, which was shut down when the gun was detected, Farbstein said. Officers confiscated the gun and detained the Maidsville woman for questioning.

Officials did not release the woman’s name.

Wednesday’s firearm discovery marked the seventh gun detected at Pittsburgh International checkpoints so far this year, Farbstein said. TSA officials caught 34 firearms at checkpoints last year.

Across the country, security officials found 4,239 guns in carry-on bags last year, a 7-percent increase over 2017, she said. Of those discovered in 2018, 86 percent were loaded, and more than one-third had a round in the chamber.

Farbstein reminded travelers that the discovery of a firearm in carry-on baggage forced the checkpoint lane to grind to a halt. A first-time citation by the TSA for bringing a gun to a checkpoint is $3,900.

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 412-380-8519, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.