Wilkins constable charged with bilking woman out of thousands in cash | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Wilkins constable charged with bilking woman out of thousands in cash

Tony LaRussa
1164858_web1_WEB-constable

A state constable has been accused of cheating a woman out of more than $3,000 by promising to help her with cases involving her child and brother.

Pittsburgh police on Wednesday charged Constable Anthony J. Cioppa Jr., 47, of Wilkins Township, with theft by deception and official repression.

Cioppa was released after appearing for a preliminary hearing before Pittsburgh District Judge Derwin Rushing. A preliminary hearing on the charges is scheduled for May 29 before Judge Kim Berkeley Clark.

The Allegheny County District Attorney’s Office will ask that as a condition of his bond, Cioppa be “prohibited from performing any court related functions statewide,” spokesman Mike Manko said Thursday.

Cioppa and his attorney could not immediately be reached for comment.

Investigators say Tiarra Reardon met Cioppa in March while he was moonlighting as an Uber driver, according to a criminal complaint filed in support of the charges.

After Cioppa told Reardon that he worked as a state constable, she confided in him that she was having “legal troubles” obtaining custody of her 13-month-old son, according to the complaint.

Cioppa allegedly told Reardon that he also worked as an investigator for a private law firm in North Versailles that would provide legal services to help get her son back at a cost of “about $5,000 over time,” to which she agreed.

On April 12, Cioppa met Reardon at her home three times and collected $750 cash during each visit, for a total of $2,250 that he said he would deliver to the law office.

The following day, Cioppa collected another $1,000 in cash from Reardon, according to investigators.

During that meeting, Reardon told Cioppa that her brother was in jail.

Cioppa allegedly responded that he would use part of the $1,000 to “get your brother out of jail and an early court date.”

When Reardon didn’t hear back from Cioppa after giving him the money she became suspicious and called the law office, but was told by a secretary that they did not have a partnership with Cioppa and did not receive any money from him for legal services.

Reardon told police that she called Cioppa to tell him that she was “aware of his dishonesty” and no longer wanted him to work on her behalf, according to the complaint.

She also told him she planned to contact a lawyer to file theft charges against him.

Cioppa allegedly responded: “Don’t get a lawyer, I got your brother out of jail. I’ll just bring the money back.”

Cioppa met with Reardon later that day, but instead of returning the money, he presented a handwritten note saying he would return the cash the following day.

According to authorities, Cioppa never showed up to pay Reardon and did not return her telephone calls. Investigators also said Cioppa did not do anything to assist Reardon’s brother.

In Pennsylvania, constables are elected in the municipality in which they reside but have authority to make arrests, by warrant, anywhere in the state.

Tony LaRussa is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tony at 724-772-6368, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.