ShareThis Page
Wilkins woman accused of stealing $300K from her ailing mother |

Wilkins woman accused of stealing $300K from her ailing mother

Megan Guza
| Friday, January 11, 2019 5:44 p.m

A Wilkins woman stole more than $300,000 from her ailing mother and used the money for contractors, attorneys, groceries, lawn care and other expenses, according to charges filed Friday against the woman.

Patricia Pangikas, 66, allegedly wrote checks to herself worth $319,607 between January 2014 and July 2017, District Attorney’s Detective Jessica Von Voigt wrote in a criminal complaint.

Pangikas’ mother, Mary Sietam, was “incapacitated,” according to the complaint. She was living at LGAR Heath and Rehabilitation Services in Turtle Creek from late 2013 until her death on July 10, 2018.

Pangikas was her mother’s power of attorney until July 2017, when Ursuline Senior Services was appointed her legal guardian.

Voigt wrote in the complaint that she began investigating Pangikas’ alleged misuse of funds in July 2017 and LGAR officials revealed they had not received a payment for Sietam’s care — about $7,750 a month – since October 2015. The facility told Voigt it still is owed more than $234,000.

Bank records showed that Sietam had about $20,205 in one of her PNC Bank accounts when she was admitted to LGAR in November 2013, Voigt wrote. More than $440,000 was deposited into that account from Sietam’s other accounts and investments. By the time Voigt began investigating, there was just over $35 in the account.

Pangikas is charged with theft by unlawful taking, receiving stolen property and misapplication of funds. She surrendered to detectives Friday and was released on her own recognizance. A preliminary hearing is scheduled for Feb. 5.

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 412-380-8519, or via Twitter @meganguzaTrib.

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 412-380-8519, or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.