Police: Woman suffers burns in Carnegie apartment fire | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Police: Woman suffers burns in Carnegie apartment fire

Madasyn Lee
1712128_web1_ptr-carnegiefire-092419
WPXI-TV
A woman suffered burns when a fire started inside her apartment at the Honus Wagner Apartments in Carnegie early Monday, Sept. 23, 2019.

A woman was taken to a Pittsburgh hospital with burns after a fire started in her Carnegie apartment early Monday, officials said.

The fire was reported at 12:30 a.m. at the Honus Wagner Apartments on Third Avenue. People were evacuated from the building, and Port Authority buses were brought in for them to use until they could return to their apartments, Tribune-Review news partner WPXI-TV reported.

Carnegie police Chief Jeff Kennedy said the woman lives on the fourth floor, and police officers were able to get her out of her apartment before firefighters arrived.

She was taken to UPMC Mercy in Pittsburgh’s Uptown, Kennedy said. The extent of her injuries wasn’t immediately known.

“I heard an explosion, and it sounded like somebody … like a whole level just flattened or something, and I thought somebody must’ve fell. Then, the alarm came on about 10 minutes later,” resident Mitzi Osborne told WPXI-TV.

No other injuries were reported, Kennedy said.

Kennedy said damage to the building was limited to the woman’s apartment, but several apartments below hers suffered water damage.

A fire marshal is investigating the cause of the fire.

Madasyn Lee is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Madasyn at [email protected], 724-226-4702 or via Twitter.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.