Work on $60M Rivers Casino hotel to begin soon on North Shore |

Work on $60M Rivers Casino hotel to begin soon on North Shore

Tom Davidson
Massaro Construction Group
A rendering of the planned The Landing Hotel Pittsburgh that will be attached to Rivers Casino on the North Shore.

High rollers and others visiting Rivers Casino on Pittsburgh’s North Shore will soon not have to leave to rest between bets.

The $60 million Landing Hotel Pittsburgh will be attached to the casino and will face the Carnegie Science Center on the east facade of the casino, Rivers announced Tuesday.

“The time is right,” Greg Carlin, CEO of Rush Street Gaming and Rivers Casino Pittsburgh, said in a news release. “We see it as a natural evolution.”

The hotel was initially planned to be built in 2017, and Rivers got approval from the Pittsburgh Planning Commission to build it then. The addition was postponed after the state approved mini-casino legislation.

The seven-story hotel will have 219 rooms and will be the second Rivers location to have a The Landing Hotel. The first was opened in Schenectady, N.Y., as part of a casino complex there.

About 128 new hotel and casino jobs and 1,400 construction jobs will be coming to the region because of the project, the casino said.

Pittsburgh-based Massaro Construction Group will build the hotel.

The project is privately funded and Rivers is in the process of acquiring the permits required from the city and getting approval from zoning and planning officials. Rivers said it will break ground on the hotel this summer, and it should open by 2021.

Tom Davidson is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tom at 724-226-4715, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.