ShareThis Page
Plum/Oakmont

Plan for bigger Oakmont Bakery advances with 2 council votes

Michael DiVittorio
| Monday, Sept. 18, 2017, 10:18 p.m.
Oakmont Bakery  at 531 Allegheny Ave.
Lillian DeDomenic | For The Tribune-Review
Oakmont Bakery at 531 Allegheny Ave.
An architect's rendering of the proposed Oakmont Bakery
Source: Desmone Architects.
An architect's rendering of the proposed Oakmont Bakery
Members of the Oakmont Bakery family gather Aug. 31, 2017, at the site of their new location across from Riverview Junior-Senior High School on Hulton Road. Pictured from left are members of the Serrao family: Susan, Anthony,  Nicholas, Samantha,  Marc II, Stephanie Serrao-Bittinger, Isabella, Marc.
Lillian DeDomenic | For The Tribune-Review
Members of the Oakmont Bakery family gather Aug. 31, 2017, at the site of their new location across from Riverview Junior-Senior High School on Hulton Road. Pictured from left are members of the Serrao family: Susan, Anthony, Nicholas, Samantha, Marc II, Stephanie Serrao-Bittinger, Isabella, Marc.
Plans are in the works for the Oakmont Bakery to move its retail and production to this site off Hulton Road across from Riverview High School.
Lillian DeDomenic | For The Tribune-Review
Plans are in the works for the Oakmont Bakery to move its retail and production to this site off Hulton Road across from Riverview High School.
Artist renderings of a proposed new Oakmont Bakery show a larger retail and production area compared to its current site.
Michael DiVittorio
Artist renderings of a proposed new Oakmont Bakery show a larger retail and production area compared to its current site.

Plans for a new Oakmont Bakery at Third Street and Hulton Road, by Riverview High School, cleared two hurdles on Monday night.

Borough council unanimously approved subdivision/lot consolidation plans, and voted 6-1 in favor of a preliminary site plan.

Councilman Thomas Whalen opposed the site plan because of traffic concerns.

“It will just make traffic chaos,” he said. “It adds to chaos in the mornings and evenings. The traffic study is inadequate.”

David Ivanek of Bankson Engineers, consulting firm for the bakery project, assured council that plans follow all recommendations of the study including adding a second entrance and egress off Hulton Road that are right turn in and right turn out.

Ivanek also noted the borough's planning commission recommended approval of both plans.

Councilman Tim Favo said bakery officials adjusted their original plans to comply with all borough zoning laws.

“It should be a positive for our community,” he said.

Council President Thomas Briney likened the plans to the nearby Walgreens, and said he doesn't see many problems with the location if the business can properly mitigate increased traffic flow.

“It's one of the most prominent sites in the town,” Briney said.

Owner Marc Serrao and his family opened the bakery in 1988. Its current location at 531 Allegheny Ave. features a retail space and a separate production building next door.

The move will put both operations and a warehouse under one roof — specifically, at the site of the former ATA Oakmont Martial Arts and Kelsey's Dance & Fitness, along with the La Tanning business, along Third Street near Hulton Road.

La Tanning still is in the process of relocating. The other two shops are gone.

Plans include demolishing that building and starting new construction that will provide the bakery with more parking and a larger seating area, and an opportunity to provide more jobs. Desmone Architects of Lawrenceville designed the new bakery.

“Our goal with the owner has been to have a highly efficient place to reach the Oakmont area and beyond,” said associate and senior architect Terry Oden. “The Oakmont Bakery is kind of iconic, highly recognized in the area. It really represents the community and is a very identifiable component. We envision this having an outdoor café porch that visitors can use; the main retail area as a great hall that's almost double the (current) space (with a) contemporary industrial flavor.”

The project still requires other approvals, such as a highway occupancy permit from PennDOT and sewer erosion and sedimentation control approval from the Allegheny County Conservation District.

Ivanek said they can move “full steam ahead with final designs” now that council gave its preliminary approval. He said it would be a few months before they had everything in place to come back to the borough for final site plan approval. Construction is expected to begin some time next year.

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-871-2367, mdivittorio@tribweb.com or via Twitter @MikeJdiVittorio.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me