ShareThis Page
Plum/Oakmont

4 incumbents, 2 newcomers on ballot in Riverview school board race

Michael DiVittorio
| Friday, Oct. 27, 2017, 3:00 p.m.
The Riverview School District administration office
The Riverview School District administration office
Lisa Ashbaugh
Submitted
Lisa Ashbaugh
Freda Aughenbaugh
Submitted
Freda Aughenbaugh
John Hackworth
Submitted
John Hackworth
Jeanine Hurt-Robinson
Submitted
Jeanine Hurt-Robinson
Arlene Loeffler
Submitted
Arlene Loeffler
Shane Michael
Submitted
Shane Michael

One of six candidates is almost guaranteed a seat on the Riverview school board after the Nov. 7 elections.

Board member Jeanine Hurt-Robinson's appointment to fill a vacancy on the board ends this year and she is running unopposed to keep the seat for two more years. She is also on the ballot for a four-year term. If she wins both seats, she chooses which one she will keep and the board will make an appointment to fill the vacant post.

Other candidates seeking one of the four, four-year seats include incumbents John Hackworth, Lisa Ashbaugh, Arlene Loeffler, and newcomers Shane Michael and Freda Aughenbaugh.

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-871-2367 or mdivittorio@tribweb.com or on Twitter @MikeJdiVittorio.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me