ShareThis Page

Oakmont expects to adopt law in January regulating oil and gas development

Michael DiVittorio
| Wednesday, Nov. 29, 2017, 9:45 a.m.
Oakmont borough building
Michael DiVittorio | Tribune-Review
Oakmont borough building

Oakmont officials have moved one step closer to regulating oil and gas well development in the borough.

A proposed ordinance is being advertised for public review and comment as required before it can be adopted. Adoption is expected in January.

The ordinance will allow gas and oil well development — including processing plants and compressor stations — as a conditional use in the borough, which means a developer has to meet several requirements before a permit allowing construction is granted. Some restrictions in the ordinance include:

• No construction from 9 p.m. to 6 a.m.

• Temporary safety and security fencing at least 6 feet high must be installed around the site.

• At least one security guard is required when a drilling rig or hydraulic fracturing equipment is at the well site.

• Each conditional use application must have a site plan.

Council President Thomas Briney likened the proposed law to a “belt and suspenders,” giving Oakmont more control on where wells can be built and operated.

“This is a big step forward for us,” he said. “We have amplified our land use restrictions.”

Borough solicitor Megan Turnbull said the ordinance could be amended again before adoption following review by the planning commission.

A copy of the proposed ordinance is available for viewing at the borough building, 767 Fifth St.

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me