ShareThis Page
Plum/Oakmont

Not so fast: Logans Ferry Road won't reopen on Friday

Brian C. Rittmeyer
| Thursday, Nov. 30, 2017, 11:39 a.m.
Construction continues on Thursday, Nov. 30, 2017, on a small bridge along Logans Ferry Road in Plum.
Louis B. Ruediger | Tribune-Review
Construction continues on Thursday, Nov. 30, 2017, on a small bridge along Logans Ferry Road in Plum.

The reopening of Logans Ferry Road in Plum has been delayed for a second time.

The heavily traveled road will not be reopening today as had been announced earlier this week because of a delay in paving, Jeff Rossi, a spokesman with Plenary Walsh Keystone Partners, said Thursday.

Its reopening is now projected for by the end of next week, Dec. 8, Rossi said.

Project representatives had initially hoped to reopen the road before Thanksgiving.

Rossi noted that a reopening next week would still be ahead of schedule.

By contract, the work is supposed to be done by Dec. 15.

Logans Ferry has been closed near Entrance Drive since Oct. 2 for a project under the state's Rapid Bridge Replacement Project.

A bridge spanning a defunct railroad spur has been removed, and the gap filled-in. Work has also included drainage improvements.

Traffic has endured an eight-mile detour. An estimated 12,000 vehicles travel the road daily, according to PennDOT.

The road is a key link between New Kensington and Oakmont.

Brian C. Rittmeyer is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-226-4701, brittmeyer@tribweb.com or via Twitter @BCRittmeyer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me