ShareThis Page

DUI, traffic charges among cases handled by Judge Linda Zucco in Plum

Michael DiVittorio
| Thursday, March 1, 2018, 5:04 p.m.

District Judge Linda Zucco recently handled the following cases. Charges filed by Plum police unless otherwise noted.

Waived preliminary hearings

• Kelli Jeannette Walker, 36, of New Kensington on charges of driving under the influence and careless driving. Charges were filed Dec. 15 in connection with an incident along the 2300 block of Golden Mile Highway.

• William Robert Corrigan, 47, of Verona on charges of driving under the influence, careless driving and reckless driving. Oakmont police filed the charges Dec. 16 in connection with an incident along the 100 block of Hulton Road.

• Torie Lyn Glasser, 28, of Verona on charges of driving under the influence, failure to keep right and driving at unsafe speed. Oakmont police filed the charges Jan. 4 in connection with an incident along the 100 block of Hulton Road.

• Lavarre Anthony Hill, 57, of Penn Hills on charges of fleeing or attempting to elude officer, passing on left unsafe, duties at stop sign, careless driving and improper screening. Charges were filed Dec. 19 in connection with an incident at Saltsburg Road and Crestview Drive.

• Steven Prazenica, 32, of Allison Park on a charge of driving under the influence. Oakmont police filed the charge Jan. 8 in connection with an incident at Allegheny River Boulevard and College Avenue.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me