ShareThis Page

Oakmont set to pave 10 streets — and an alley — this season

Michael DiVittorio
| Thursday, May 10, 2018, 4:48 p.m.

Oakmont officials plan to spend more than $460,000 to pave 10 streets and an alley this year.

The proposed paving list, which is expected to be approved and put out for bid during Oakmont's May 21 voting meeting, includes the following roads: 12th Street, 13th Street, Pennsylvania Avenue, Commons Drive, Ironwood Way, Ann Street, Crystal Drive, Cedar Way, View Street, Gum Way and Seventh Street.

Borough engineer Amber Yon of Senate Engineering estimated the project will cost $464,000. Council had budgeted about $350,000 for paving this year.

Councilman Tim Favo proposed adding the $120,000 needed to get everything done instead of cutting from the list.

“If I can find a dollar and put it into paving I'm going to do it,” he said. “All streets could use paving. It's like putting a jigsaw puzzle together and trying to be fair.”

Additional borough funding sources include an account that's been idle, and savings from a waterproofing project for the administration building that came in under budget.

Council discussed paving Maple Street last month, but it was moved to a “future” list along with Allegheny Avenue, 14th Street and Greer Way.

Favo said the borough is also working on a deal with the Oakmont Water Authority to pave California Avenue.

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-871-2367, or via Twitter @MikeJdiVittorio.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me