ShareThis Page

Oakmont preliminary budget holds line on taxes

| Thursday, Nov. 8, 2018, 9:06 p.m.

Oakmont property taxes are projected to go unchanged in the proposed 2019 budget, remaining at 3.73 mills for the fourth straight year.

Borough manager Lisa Cooper Jensen presented the 2019 preliminary budget Nov. 5, proposing approximately $3.5 million in spending and $4.3 million in revenue.

“The borough has always had the lowest millage rates of the three taxing bodies, meaning the borough, the school district and the county,” Jensen said.

Jensen said the budget includes costs for repaving and installing an ADA ramp at Riverside Park, buying a new ladder truck for the fire department and new equipment for the street department, and digitizing all borough records.

Council intends to adopt a final budget at the Dec. 17 meeting in council chambers.

In other council news:

Moments before presenting the proposed budget, Jensen announced her resignation as borough manager after six years.

“It was a privilege to work a job that I love with colleagues and coworkers that I admire,” Jensen said.

Jensen has held the title of borough manager since 2012, but served as borough secretary prior to her appointment. In total, she has worked more than 30 years for the community.

“The borough really appreciates (Jensen’s) 32 years of service to Oakmont,” said council President William Benusa.

Christine Manganas is a Tribune-Review contributing writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me