2 former Oakmont councilwomen, political newcomer take Democratic nods in primary | TribLIVE.com
Plum/Oakmont

2 former Oakmont councilwomen, political newcomer take Democratic nods in primary

Michael DiVittorio
1202575_web1_oakmont-borough

Two former councilwomen and a political newcomer won Democratic Party nods for three, four-year seats on Oakmont Council.

Lindsay Osterhout (470 votes) was the top vote-getter in the May 21 primary election with 28% of the votes. She was followed by Nancy Ride (429) at 25% and Sophia Facaros (361) at 21%.

They nudged out fellow Democrats Terese Connerton and Tracey Holst.

About 14% out of the borough’s nearly 2,700 registered voters took part in the election, according to complete but unofficial returns from the Allegheny County Elections Division.

Osterhout and her husband, Karl, own and operate Osterhout Berger Disability Law. She also serves on the Oakmont Carnegie Library Board and is a coach for Girls on the Run.

She holds a degree in communications from Saint Vincent College and a law degree from the University of Pittsburgh.

Ride served two terms on council starting in 2008. She is a former paralegal and serves on the Oakmont Carnegie Library board. She earned a history degree from Wittenberg University in Springfield, Ohio.

Facaros served on council from 2014 through 2018 and took a break to spend more time with her grandchildren.

She is a retired principal from Pittsburgh Public Schools with 38 years in education. Facaros formerly served on the borough’s parks and recreation board.

Republicans William Wengerd, Matthew Duran and Andrew Zentgraf will be their political opponents in November.

They were the only three GOP candidates on the primary ballot for the four-year seats.

Democrat David Brankley and Republican Randy Galm will oppose each other in November for a two-year seat. They were the only two candidates seeking that spot.

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Michael at 412-871-2367, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Plum
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.