Democrats grab 5 of 6 Plum school board seats, defeat Republican incumbents | TribLIVE.com
Plum/Oakmont

Democrats grab 5 of 6 Plum school board seats, defeat Republican incumbents

Michael DiVittorio
1904308_web1_Plum-Amy-Wetmore
Submitted
Amy Wetmore
1904308_web1_Plum-Adam-Hill
Submitted
Adam Hill
1904308_web1_Joe-Tommarello
Submitted
Joe Tommarello
1904308_web1_pal-pbsd01-050919
Submitted
Michael Devine
1904308_web1_Plum-Michael-Caliguiri
Submitted
Michael Caliguiri
1904308_web1_plum-michelle-stepnick
Submitted
Michelle Stepnick
1904308_web1_plum-high-school-sign

Plum school board Democratic candidates nearly swept all races at Tuesday night’s election.

Ten candidates ran for five four-year seats and two contested for a two-year seat.

Contests are split along party lines with six Democrats and six Republicans

Incumbents Steve Schlauch (9.59%), Sue Caldwell (9.52%), Karin Acquaviva (9.14%) and fellow Republicans Jacqueline Thomas (8.7%) and Nathan Polacek (8.58%) were defeated by challengers Michael Devine (12.16%), Michael Caliguiri (11.21%), Adam Hill (10.49%), Amy Wetmore (10.17%) and former school board member Michelle Stepnick (9.93%), according to unofficial returns from Allegheny County Elections Division.

“All we can do is figure out what went wrong, pick up the pieces and go from there,” said Schlauch in an email, adding that voter turnout in Plum was low, with Republicans staying home, “…which is why we lost.”

Caldwell and Polacek could not be reached for comment. Devine, a registered Republican, earned enough votes in the primary to be on the Democratic ticket.

Former school board member Joe Tommarello was the lone Republican winner edging out Plum alum Tim Sandstrom for a two-year seat.

Tommarello earned 11.24% to Sandstrom’s 10.31%. Sandstrom could not be reached for comment.

“Having the public’s trust in me to give me a chance on the school board means so much to me, and I feel truly blessed. It’s clear the community spoke in volumes today. Being the only Republican who won the race, it’s time for some changes in Plum.

“I feel the parents have felt out on the cold the past couple years, and we need to do a better job of communicating and working with all parents, taxpayers and stakeholders,” Tommarello said. “I’m looking forward to being a part of positive change here in Plum.”

Key issues for the candidates were financial management, student safety and transparency.

“I think very much it was a message that we need to have a more transparent and open government in Plum,” Wetmore said about the victories. “We need to focus more on the community, and at the school district level we need to focus on what’s best for our children. It’s not about politics.”

Tuesday’s results were about the opposite result of the school board elections two years ago when Republicans swept the races.

“I think that we’re going to bring about a positive change for the community,” said Wetmore, Plum Democratic Committee chairperson. “I’ve been really lucky to work with some great people, and I’m very excited about what lies ahead.”

The district recently started video recording its meetings again. Hill would often record board meetings via cellphone and post them to Facebook.

Hill said he’s excited for the opportunity to be on the other side of the board table and build on the transparency efforts.

“This is absolutely incredible to see the support this community gave us,” Hill said. “I am indebted to everyone who came out and voted for me, and I couldn’t be happier. I look forward to working for everyone in this community. Voters are tired of education being put in the back burner. They’re tired of their kids being affected by decisions the board’s making, and it’s now time to move this district forward.”

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Michael at 412-871-2367, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Plum
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.