DUI, theft cases among those recently handled by Judge Zucco in Plum | TribLIVE.com
Plum/Oakmont

DUI, theft cases among those recently handled by Judge Zucco in Plum

Michael DiVittorio
1401287_web1_gavel

District Judge Linda Zucco recently handled the following cases. Charges were filed by Plum police unless otherwise noted.

Waived preliminary hearings

  • Michelle Walker, 42, of Plum on charges of driving under the influence, driving without a license, driving with a suspended license and careless driving. Charges were filed Feb. 3.
  • Paul Brewer, 41, of New Kensington on charges of driving under the influence, careless driving and accident involving damage to unattended vehicle or property. Charges were filed April 19.
  • Amy Schlessman, 37, of Cheswick on charges of driving under the influence and careless driving. Oakmont police filed the charges April 19.
  • Patrick Trosch, 39, of Pittsburgh on charges of driving under the influence and failure to keep right. Charges were filed May 7.
  • David Bechtol, 62, of Pittsburgh on charges of driving under the influence, reckless driving, failure to stop and give information or render aid and improper tires. Oakmont police filed the charges March 30.
  • Dale Ramey, 29, of Penn Hills on five counts of theft by deception and five counts of access device used to obtain property or service. Charges were filed May 13.
  • Brandon Plunkett, 27, of Plum on charges of driving under the influence and careless driving. Charges were filed April 1.

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Michael at 412-871-2367, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Plum
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.