DUI, theft cases among those recently handled by Judge Zucco in Plum | TribLIVE.com

DUI, theft cases among those recently handled by Judge Zucco in Plum

Michael DiVittorio

District Judge Linda Zucco recently handled the following cases. Charges were filed by Plum police unless otherwise noted.

Waived preliminary hearings

• Jason Pickford, 32, of Pittsburgh on charges of improper pass, reckless driving, exceeding maximum speed limits, duties at stop signs, driving with a suspended license, fleeing or attempting to elude officer, resisting arrest, obstructing administers of the law, two counts of recklessly endangering another person, two counts of theft by unlawful taking and two counts of receiving stolen property. Charges were filed July 25.

• Samuel Moorehead, 44, of Plum on charges of driving under the influence and failure to stop at red signal. Oakmont police filed the charges April 16.

• James McKee, 27, of Plum on charges of intimidation of witness, terroristic threats and harassment. Charges were filed July 17.

McKee went before the judge on another case. He waived a preliminary hearing on charges of criminal use of a communication facility, receiving stolen property, theft by unlawful taking, two counts of possession of controlled substances and three counts of conspiracy. Charges were filed July 8.

• Patricia Paul, 47, of Creighton on charges of theft by unlawful taking and access device used to obtain property/service. Charges were filed May 31.

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Michael at 412-871-2367, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Plum
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.