ShareThis Page
DUI, theft cases among those recently handled by Judge Zucco in Plum | TribLIVE.com
Plum/Oakmont

DUI, theft cases among those recently handled by Judge Zucco in Plum

Michael DiVittorio
980057_web1_GavelNewN

District Judge Linda Zucco recently handled the following cases. Charges were filed by Plum police unless otherwise noted.

Waived preliminary hearings

  • Maria Cartieri, 23, of Monroeville on charges of driving under the influence, disregard traffic lane and careless driving. Charges were filed Feb. 14.
  • Kevin Abraham, 33, of Pittsburgh on charges of theft by deception, theft by unlawful taking and receiving stolen property. Charges were filed Nov. 5.
  • Jared Martorell, 19, of Plum on charges of possession with intent to deliver, possession of controlled substances and following too closely. Charges were filed Oct. 22.
  • Michael Stramaski, 27, of Avonmore on charges of driving under the influence. Charges were filed Jan. 6.
  • Heather Quear, 36, of Pitcairn on charges of theft by unlawful taking, receiving stolen property and disorderly conduct. Charges were filed Jan. 11.
  • Richard Carter, 61, of Monroeville on charges of providing false identification to law enforcement, possession of controlled substances, driving without a license, failure to carry license and driving with a suspended license. Charges were filed Feb. 17.
  • Gregory Cerchiaro, 57, on charges of driving under the influence. Charges were filed Jan. 10.
  • Isaiah Holden, 19, of Penn Hills on charges of possession with intent to deliver and possession of controlled substances. Charges were filed Oct. 22.
  • Giovanni Josephs, 19, of Plum on charges of possession of marijuana. Charges were filed Oct. 22.

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Michael at 412-871-2367, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Plum
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.