ShareThis Page
NAACP calls for Plum school board member’s resignation | TribLIVE.com
Plum/Oakmont

NAACP calls for Plum school board member’s resignation

Dillon Carr
722390_web1_Racist_Brian
The Facebook post that was shared Feb. 1 by Plum school board member Brian Wisniewski said: “Does it worry anybody that we have three devout Muslims in Congress who have unlimited access to our TOP SECRET GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS?”
722390_web1_pal-plumfolo
Brian Wisniewski

The NAACP Allegheny East Branch is calling for the resignation of a Plum school board member after a controversial Facebook share that has been criticized as being anti-Muslim.

“The Allegheny East NAACP found (Brian Wisniewski’s) share on Facebook absolutely offensive and unacceptable. His claim that it was an accidental share does not excuse the very racist statement made by the originator of the post,” said Kenneth Huston, president of the chapter, in a news release issued Thursday.

The Plum Borough School District issued a statement Tuesday condemning the post.

Fellow board members have remained mum on the situation and board member Scott Coulson said the board will have a statement on the matter later.

Wisniewski said in a prepared statement the share was an accident.

“This specific meme was shared in succession with other varying topic memes that I shared,” he said. “I do not agree with the post.”

The NAACP Allegheny East Branch represents Monroeville, Murrysville, Plum, Wilmerding, Wilkins, Pitcairn, East McKeesport and East Pittsburgh.

Dillon Carr is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Dillon at 412-871-2325, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Plum
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.