PennDOT approves more turning restrictions near new Oakmont Bakery |

PennDOT approves more turning restrictions near new Oakmont Bakery

Michael DiVittorio
Michael DiVittorio | Tribune-Review
Parking traffic congestion have become issues at the new Oakmont Bakery at Third Street and Hulton Road in Oakmont.
Michael DiVittorio | Tribune-Review
Motorists have ignored traffic restrictions at the Third Street and Hulton Road intersection while trying to enter and exit the new Oakmont Bakery.

PennDOT has approved more turning restrictions at a busy Oakmont intersection that the borough’s mayor said was a problem before the popular Oakmont Bakery opened a new location there and compounded traffic headaches.

Westbound motorists on Hulton Road who are headed toward Hulton Bridge will be prohibited from turning left onto Third Street from 7 to 9 a.m. and 2 to 4 p.m. on weekdays as soon as PennDOT installs the signs at the intersection.

Those times coincide with the already existing restrictions that allow northbound motorists on Third Street and eastbound motorists on Hulton Road to make right turns only.

“We have identified this as a problem intersection since long before the new location of the Oakmont Bakery opened,” said Oakmont Mayor Christopher Whaley.

“The increased traffic due to the Oakmont Bakery has provided enough evidence to warrant these additional restrictions,” Whaley said. “This is the first step toward improving safety in this corridor and we will continue to explore every avenue pertaining to safety, until we are confident we have obtained the best possible scenario the circumstances allow.”

Motorists have ignored the right-turn-only restrictions for some time. Traffic problems were exacerbated with the Feb. 5 opening of the new Oakmont Bakery location at the intersection, even though the business has more than 100 parking spaces and two lots.

Borough officials submitted a letter to PennDOT the day after the new Oakmont Bakery opened requesting the no-left-turn restriction. The state sent traffic engineers to the area and conducted a traffic study in response.

“The results of the study showed that the restriction was warranted and approved,” PennDOT spokesman Steve Cowan said Monday night. “We agreed to install the ‘no left turn’ signs as soon as they were received and our operations permitted.”

Cowan did not know when the new signs would be installed.

“It’s a good thing,” police Chief Michael Ford said of the new restrictions. “PennDOT was very cooperative and acted quickly.”

Ford met with bakery owner Marc Serrao shortly after the Feb. 5 opening to address parking and traffic concerns.

“He gave me some great suggestions, and we’re implementing all of them,” Serrao said last month. “We will continue to work at ensuring safety for the community and an enjoyable experience for our guests.”

Ford said problems have decreased at the intersection and it appears motorists may have gotten the message.

“It’s getting better. People are getting used to the area and where to park,” he said.

One Third Street traffic issue remains under consideration.

As of Monday, an online petition led by Riverview High School junior Molly Collins to designate about 30 parking spaces at Riverside Park next to the high school and across from the bakery’s secondary lot has received 679 signatures out of its goal of 750.

Collins talked with Oakmont Council about the possible student parking designation at a meeting last month.

“It’s public property, but the students have been unofficially parking there for 30 years since Riverview High School opened,” Collins, 17, said.

Council members at this month’s workshop meeting said the matter is being considered, but they do not plan to take action on it at the March 18 voting session.

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Michael at 412-871-2367, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Plum | Top Stories
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.