ShareThis Page
Plum residents not buying school board member post was ‘accidental’ |

Plum residents not buying school board member post was ‘accidental’

Dillon Carr
Brian Wisniewski
The Facebook post that was shared Feb. 1 by Plum school board member Brian Wisniewski said: “Does it worry anybody that we have three devout Muslims in Congress who have unlimited access to our TOP SECRET GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS?”

By and large, Plum residents are not buying that a school board member’s Facebook post that has been criticized as being anti-Muslim was an accident.

Plum school board member Brian Wisniewski said the Feb. 1 post was accidental after some residents went to social media demanding him to resign and the school district condemned the post that read: “Does it worry anybody that we have three devout Muslims in Congress who have unlimited access to our TOP SECRET GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS?”

The post has since been removed from his profile.

Several people in Plum social media groups have said they don’t buy Wisniewski’s excuse.

Others weren’t so tactful in their approach to rebuke Wisniewski.

Some people defended Wisniewski’s action as exercising free speech.

Sharing something on social media can be accidental, said Heather Starr Fielder, Point Park University professor of social media.

“It could have been accidental. Sometimes people share something quickly without thinking about the repercussions,” Starr Fielder said. “But in a way that’s something telling, right? If your gut reaction is to share it without thinking, is that your true feelings on it?”

Starr Fielder said her advice to her students – and everyone – is to slow down.

“People need to be cautious on social media,” she said. “We need to be diligent about the content we’re writing and sharing. It’s all a reflection of ourselves. It’s important for people to slow down and think about what they’re posting and think about how what we’re posting is reading to our constituents or neighbors or friends or family.”

But she also warned social media users to be cautious to have a “mob mentality” and jumping to judgments too quickly.

“Sometimes people are jumping on the bandwagon and making an evil person out of someone without knowing the person or the full story. Before calling for the resignation or calling for them to be fired – it’s easy to jump on the bandwagon before we know all the information,” she said.

For example, she said, how many engagements did Wisniewski’s post receive? Did people comment on the post? If those things happened, he would have received notifications, she said. On the flip side, if there was minimal or zero engagement, he could have missed the mistake.

What concerns her, as a parent with a child in an area public school, is how long Wisniewski’s post remained on his profile page.

Former school board President Michelle Stepnick has said the post was up for three days before it disappeared.

“Certainly that’s a red flag,” Starr Fielder said. “If it was truly a mistake and three days went by before he noticed and deleted it, OK. But if three days go by before he realized his opinion was going to get him in trouble that’s a different story. So we can’t say what the truth is now.”

Wisneiwski did not return a phone call seeking comment.

Board members Richard Zucco, Sue Caldwell, Vicky Roessler, Jim Rogers, Steve Schlauch and Scott Kolar were not immediately available to comment.

When reached by phone, board member Scott Coulson said the board will have a statement on the matter later.

When asked if he thinks Wisniewski should resign, Coulson declined to comment. When asked if he believes Wisniewski’s post was accidental, he said, “I can only go by what he says. If he says it was accidental, that’s what he says.”

Dillon Carr is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Dillon at 412-871-2325, [email protected] or via Twitter @dillonswriting.

Dillon Carr is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Dillon at 412-871-2325, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Plum
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.