Plum school board postpones real estate tax-related vote | TribLIVE.com
Plum/Oakmont

Plum school board postpones real estate tax-related vote

Michael DiVittorio
662015_web1_plum-high-school

Plum School District officials postponed a vote on whether the district will limit any tax increase next year to the state’s Act 1 index.

Board members were to approve at the Jan. 22 regular meeting a resolution to stay within the Act 1 index — a state formula restricting real estate tax hikes — or advertise a 2019-20 preliminary budget and seek exemptions.

Steve Schlauch, board member and finance committee chairman, said they decided to table the vote until a special meeting at 6 p.m. Jan. 29 at the high school library.

“There were some board members who felt they weren’t ready to make a decision at the voting meeting,” Schlauch said. “I felt it was fair to move it back an extra week to give everyone a fair opportunity to do their due diligence and their own research regarding the budget. I’m in favor of not raising taxes.”

The state’s deadline for a school district to either adopt an Act 1 resolution or develop a preliminary budget for public inspection is Jan. 31.

Plum could avoid needing a preliminary budget at this time by adopting the resolution. It would then craft a proposed final budget and post it for the public by May 31. Under that scenario, the district would have to limit any tax increase to 0.65 mills.

The district would have to formally adopt a preliminary budget by Feb. 20 if the resolution is not approved.

A final budget must be adopted by the end of June regardless of what the board decides this month.

District Business Manager John Zahorchak offered several budgetary scenarios at a finance committee meeting Jan. 15.

Two included no tax increases while another had a tax hike beyond the Act 1 index to create a capital fund to address building maintenance and related projects. All relied on teacher contract negotiations going the district’s way.

Both the teachers union and the district have declined to discuss contract terms until a deal is approved.

Zahorchak’s presentation showed an estimated $1.1 million shortfall in the 2019-20 preliminary budget with projected revenues around $64 million and expenses just over $65 million.

He said increased pension obligations, salaries, cyber/charter school tuition and health care costs over the past several years forced the board to increase taxes, close Regency Park Elementary, reduce kindergarten from full- to half-day and furlough staff for this year’s budget.

The current millage is 21.0757. An increase to the index limit would be 21.729 mills, which means an owner of a $100,000 home would pay $65 more in real estate taxes.

A tax hike beyond the index with the special education and pension exemptions could raise the millage rate to an estimated 22.024 mills. That would result in a $100,000 property owner paying roughly $94 more.

Zahorchak said the exact millage rate with the exemptions could not be determined without state approval.

Presentation documents were posted on the district’s website at bit.ly/2HkMVAe.


Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Michael at 412-871-2367, [email protected] or via Twitter @MikeJdiVittorio.


Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Michael at 412-871-2367, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Plum
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.