ShareThis Page
Plum’s preliminary budget has no tax increase despite gap | TribLIVE.com
Plum/Oakmont

Plum’s preliminary budget has no tax increase despite gap

Michael DiVittorio
1044924_web1_plum-high-school-sign

Plum School District board members are not proposing a tax increase or program cuts despite a deficit in the 2019-20 preliminary budget.

Next year’s spending plan still has an estimated $457,000 gap, which officials plan to close through several options by the end of June.

“We can still do some work on the budget,” said Steve Schlauch, board member and finance committee chairman. “We’re approaching a balanced budget without taking any instructional time away from students and being good fiscal stewards of taxpayer dollars. We’ve come a long way. Things are looking good.”

Projected revenues were listed at about $64.65 million and expenses at $65.115 million.

The board adopted a resolution in January pledging not to raise taxes above the Act 1 index, a state formula used to limit real estate tax hikes.

The current millage is 21.0757. An increase to the index limit would be 21.729 mills, a 3.1 percent hike.

That means an owner of a $100,000 home would pay $65 more in real estate taxes.

District officials increased taxes, closed Regency Park Elementary, reduced kindergarten from full- to half-day and furloughed more than 20 teachers for this year’s budget.

The district reduced the shortfall from $1.1 million at the start of budget planning.

Schlauch said the deficit was reduced due to a projected $250,000 increase in state subsidies in basic and special education funding, four teacher resignations this school year and about $250,000 pulled from the district’s Access fund.

That fund includes about $100,000 from the Allegheny Intermediate Unit and more than $500,000 from the district billing other entities for special education services.

Schlauch said the district could pull more from that fund in order to help close the current budget deficit. He also expects three to five employees will retire.

May 10 is the deadline for employees to announce their retirement in order to receive incentives.

District Business Manager John Zahorchak said the board also could draw from its reserve funds in order to close the gap.

The district took out a 12-year, $5.6 million bond in June 2017 to help balance the 2017-18 budget and have funds at least the next three years. Taking $457,000 would leave about $2 million in the account.

Zahorchak said some old bonds could be refinanced for additional savings.

Delinquent tax collection and rental fees are projected to generate $70,000 more in revenue next school year, and real estate tax assessments went up from last year netting the district an estimated $50,000 in additional funds.

The district could sell some real estate for additional revenue. A vacant lot near Pivik Elementary School was put on the market for $199,000, and the Regency Park building is up for sale for $1.9 million. It was appraised at $2.5 million.

The board and administrators had a budget meeting April 16, and plans to approve its preliminary budget May 21 and formally adopt a final budget June 25.

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Michael at 412-871-2367, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Plum
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.