ShareThis Page

30 in northwestern Pa. charged with running crystal meth ring

Tony LaRussa
| Tuesday, Sept. 26, 2017, 5:39 a.m.

Thirty people in five northwestern Pennsylvania counties have been charged in connection with the shipment and sale of $1.6 million worth of crystal methamphetamine over an 18-month period, state investigators announced.

The crystal meth was shipped to Jefferson County and the surrounding area through the U.S. mail from drug dealers in Arizona and California, Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro said.

The 35 pounds of meth was broken up into as many as 64,000 ¼-gram and ½-gram doses and then sold by the ring of 30 dealers in Jefferson, Clearfield, Clarion, Elk and Forest counties, Shapiro said.

Most of the drugs were shipped from Larry Dean, 58, who has residences in Mayport, Clarion County, and Tucson, Ariz. The shipments were received by Dale Hanlin, 66, of Cooksburg, Forest County, investigators said.

Authorities used a combination of controlled purchases, electronic surveillance, package interceptions and other tactics to identify the drug dealers involved.

The case was investigated by the state police, U.S. postal inspectors, officers from the attorney general's office and local police.

Suspects were charged with conspiracy, possession with intent to deliver drugs and operating corrupt organizations.

Tony LaRussa is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-772-6368, or via Twitter @TonyLaRussaTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me