ShareThis Page

Good Samaritans stop suspected DUI driver on Pennsylvania Turnpike

Brian C. Rittmeyer
| Friday, Dec. 1, 2017, 4:30 a.m.
State police say Good Samaritans stopped a suspected DUI driver at mile marker 15.8 on the Pennsylvania Turnpike.
State police say Good Samaritans stopped a suspected DUI driver at mile marker 15.8 on the Pennsylvania Turnpike.

State police were lauding the “outstanding efforts” of two Good Samaritans who used their own vehicles to stop a suspected drunk driver on the Pennsylvania Turnpike in Beaver County Thursday.

According to state police, the driver, Frank Ray Blackmon, 53, of Waynesburg was traveling west on Interstate 76 shortly before 10 p.m. Thursday in North Sewickley Township.

The two witnesses, who were not identified, were directly behind Blackmon.

State police said they allegedly saw Blackmon being unable to keep control of his vehicle, a Chevrolet Impala.

“It was reported by the two Good Samaritans/witnesses that the accused was weaving within his travel lane, bouncing from the right hand travel lane to the left hand travel lane back and forth with the accused almost striking the concrete barrier divider of Interstate 76 westbound and also almost traveling onto the embankment located on the north side roadside area,” state police said in a release.

According to state police, the two witnesses used their vehicles to box in Blackmon's car and bring him safely to a stop on the shoulder in North Sewickley Township.

A state police trooper that arrived on the scene said Blackmon was allegedly visibly intoxicated, and allegedly found an open container of vodka in plain view.

Blackmon's driving license is suspended, state police said.

Blackmon was arrested for suspicion of driving under the influence. That charge and several summary traffic violation charges were pending lab results.

Brian C. Rittmeyer is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-226-4701, or on Twitter @BCRittmeyer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me