ShareThis Page

Hopewell grad removed from Florida teaching job after racist podcast discovered

| Tuesday, March 6, 2018, 11:33 a.m.
Dayanna Volitich
iTunes/Crystal River Middle School Facebook account
Dayanna Volitich

A Hopewell High School graduate who was teaching middle school social studies in Florida finds herself at the center of controversy after being outed this week by the Huffington Post as the host and producer of a podcast advocating white supremacy.

Dayanna Volitich espoused white nationalist views in her podcast, Unapologetic, and claimed among other things that Islam legitimizes terrorist behavior and terrorist attacks will continue until Muslims are eradicated. She bragged how she hid her views from school administrators and then, after being outed, claimed that the podcast was satire, The Washington Post reported .

Volitich's employer, Citrus County School District, removed her from the classroom and launched an investigation after becoming aware of her social media activity. She taught at Crystal River Middle School, about 80 miles north of Tampa.

Volitich used the alias Tiana Dalichov in her podcast, which has since been taken down. She used the alias on two Facebook pages, as well as Twitter and YouTube.

Volitich could not be reached. A phone number listed for her in Florida has been disconnected.

In a 2010 article in the Beaver County Times , Volitich, then a Hopewell senior and keyboardist in the school's jazz orchestra, said she was interested in pursuing a music career.

She earned a bachelor's degree in history from Ohio State University and had been pursuing a master's in educational studies at Johns Hopkins University when she applied for a teaching job in the Florida school district, the Citrus County Chronicle reported .

Suzanne Elliott is a Tribune-Review staff writer. She can be reached at 412-871-2346, or Twitter @41Suzanne.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me