ShareThis Page

New York man pleads guilty to fake credit card conspiracy targeting Western Pa. stores

Natasha Lindstrom
| Wednesday, May 16, 2018, 7:51 p.m.
AP Photo
AP Photo

A New York man pleaded guilty to a conspiracy charge for his role in a fake credit card scheme that bilked more than $91,000 from businesses in Western Pennsylvania, federal prosecutors in Pittsburgh said.

Dashamae Wayne, 27, of the St. Albans, Queens section of New York City, was accused of working with conspirators to use counterfeit credit cards at multiple stores in the region to buy gift cards and merchandise in June 2016, U.S. Attorney Scott W. Brady said.

Wayne faces a maximum sentence of up to five years in prison, a $250,000 fine or both.

At least five others were charged with participating in the same bogus credit card scheme, including Jersey City resident Isaac Johnson and Brooklyn residents Christopher Candelaria, William Candelaria, Corey Howard and Renaldo D. Coleman.

Officials said the stores targeted included Giant Eagle and Sam's Club.

Coleman pleaded guilty to a conspiracy charge in January.

U.S. District Judge Nora Barry Fischer scheduled Wayne's sentencing hearing for Nov. 2.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Gregory C. Melucci is prosecuting the case with help from the Western Pennsylvania Financial Crimes Task Force, a multi-agency effort focused on combating financial crimes such as identity fraud.

Natasha Lindstrom is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at, 412-380-8514 or via Twitter @NewsNatasha.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me