ShareThis Page
Regional

UMW to observe Robena Mine disaster of 1962

| Monday, Dec. 3, 2018, 4:33 p.m.
An ambulance waits as snow falls outside Frosty Run shaft at Robena Mine No. 3 in Greene County on Dec. 6, 1962.
submitted
An ambulance waits as snow falls outside Frosty Run shaft at Robena Mine No. 3 in Greene County on Dec. 6, 1962.
The UMWA erected the Robina Monument near Masontown to remember the 37 miners who lost their lives in the Robena No. 3 Mine explosion on December 06, 1962.
Tribune-Review
The UMWA erected the Robina Monument near Masontown to remember the 37 miners who lost their lives in the Robena No. 3 Mine explosion on December 06, 1962.

The anniversary of the Robena No. 3 Mine disaster in Greene County that killed 37 men on Dec. 6, 1962, will be observed at 11 a.m. Thursday at the Robena monument on Route 21, just west of the former Hatfields Ferry Power Station near Carmichaels.

United Mine Workers International President Cecil Roberts is scheduled to speak at the memorial service, along with Levi Allen, UMWA International secretary-treasurer.

The 37 men, including a Penn State mining engineer student, were killed in a methane gas explosion at the Robena No. 3 Mine’s Frosty Run Shaft. The mine, reported to be the largest mechanized mine, was owned by U.S. Steel Corp. in Pittsburgh.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me