25 years ago, USAir Flight 427 crashed near Hopewell despite perfect conditions | TribLIVE.com
Regional

25 years ago, USAir Flight 427 crashed near Hopewell despite perfect conditions

Megan Guza
1648036_web1_ptr-25flight42702-090919
Tribune-Review file photo
A memorial stone, dedicated to those killed in the crash of USAir Flight 427 in 1994, is located at the crash site in Hopewell, Beaver County, Thursday, September 3rd, 2009.

It was sunnier 25 years ago than it was today.

“Folks, from the flight deck we should be on the ground in ‘bout 10 more minutes. Sunny skies, little hazy,” the first officer of USAir Flight 427 told the 127 passengers over the intercom. “Temperature’s, ah — 75 degrees, wind’s out of the west around 10 mph.”

Within minutes, the Boeing 737 would plummet to the ground near Hopewell as it prepared to land at Pittsburgh International Airport.

The National Transportation Safety Board would later find — after the longest investigation into the board’s history — a rudder malfunction caused the crash that killed all 132 on board. The report, released March 24, 1999, detailed the investigation and included a transcript of air and ground communications as well as a transcript of the cockpit voice recorder.

The flight from Chicago O’Hare was set to land in Pittsburgh before going on to West Palm Beach. Most on board were Pittsburgh-bound.

Federal investigators sift through the No. 2 engine remains of USAir flight 427 on Sept. 14, 1994, after the Sept. 8, 1994, crash that killed all 132 onboard the flight from Chicago to Pittsburgh. (Associated Press)

Brian Stashak, vice president of terminal operations for the Allegheny County Airport Authority, was a gate agent for USAir at the time. He told Blue Sky, a news outlet run by Pittsburgh International and the airport authority, that he knew disaster was possible but never expected it.

“I never thought it would be something like that — something just dropping out of the sky like that on a day as beautiful as today,” he told Blue Sky.

The New York Times, in the days after the crash, profiled as many of the 132 victims as possible.

“Timothy McCoy, 27, had been repairing a machine that had broken down in Rockford, Ill. Lisa M. Ferm, 34, a regional director for Interstate Hotels, was returning home with two colleagues,” Tamar Lewin wrote in the Sept. 10, 1994, edition of the paper. “David Mirilovich, 38, had gone to an engineering seminar. Randall Dellefield, 37, was at a conference with others from the Federal Department of Energy. Larry Grondin, 41, was on his way back from a machine tool show. And Daniel A. Clark, 61, had been to his company’s home office near Chicago.”

Erik Kelemen, then an airport firefighter, told Blue Sky the crew rushed to the scene while listening to the air traffic control radio.

“(As) we were listening to it on the crash phone, you could tell something was wrong because the air traffic controller on the line almost sounded like he was breaking up — as if he was in tears or confused or just couldn’t believe what he was telling us,” he told the outlet.

The 20th anniversary of the crash in 2014 was the last formal memorial event for families and friends of victims.

“It has served its purpose,” Dennis Connolly said at the time. Connolly, whose twin brother, Robert, died in the crash, served as a spokesman for the group that formed after the crash, the Flight 427 Air Disaster Support League.

The group helped push the passage of the Aviation Disaster Family Assistance Act two years after the crash, and it became a model for the National Air Disaster Alliance and Foundation.

“Things are different now,” Connolly told the Trib in 2014. “People left behind are treated more humanely.”

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 412-380-8519, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Regional | Top Stories
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.