ShareThis Page
Beaver Falls woman accused of misusing $13,000 in federal housing money |

Beaver Falls woman accused of misusing $13,000 in federal housing money

Chuck Biedka

A Beaver Falls woman is accused of misusing about $13,500 of federal housing assistance payments.

Janile Fielding, 56, was indicted by a federal grand jury in Pittsburgh on Wednesday.

According to the indictment, from about June 2013 until about May 2017, Fielding used housing assistance payments for her other expenses. The money is only to make mortgage payments.

She is accused of one count of theft of federal funds and three counts of filing false documents to the government.

According to court papers, Fielding sent a letter to the U.S. Housing and Urban Development Department stating she had deposited the money in an interest bearing account and would have a penalty if she withdrew the money sooner. However, the government alleges she actually spent the money.

She also is accused of filing false documents to explain how the money was spent.

According to federal officials, Fielding also gave federal offices two invoices, one for $11,200 and the other for $2,350 worth of repairs that had been done to her residence. The paperwork was marked paid in full.

But prosecutors say she pocketed the money and no such repairs were done.

She is scheduled to be formally charged on April 3 at federal district court in Pittsburgh.

Assistant United States Attorney Lee J. Karl is prosecuting this case.

The Inspector General Offices of HUD and the Department of Agriculture conducted the investigation.

Chuck Biedka is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chuck at 724-226-4711, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Regional
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.