Beaver pipeline explosion cited in DEP move to halt permits |

Beaver pipeline explosion cited in DEP move to halt permits

Stephen Huba
Adam Pope, a spokesman for Sunoco Logistics, shows off its plans for the Mariner East 2 liquids pipeline project and answers questions from potentially impacted Westmoreland County residents during an open house at the Adamsburg Volunteer Fire Department on Thursday, Feb. 26, 2015.

The state Department of Environmental Protection says it is not approving any more clean water permits for Energy Transfer LP until the Texas-based company corrects problems related to a Beaver County pipeline explosion in September .

DEP Secretary Patrick McDonnell said Friday that Energy Transfer, operator of the Revolution pipeline in Beaver County, has failed to comply with an October order that it stabilize disturbed areas and prevent further erosion from the construction area.

The methane gas explosion destroyed one home in Beaver County last September.

“In October, DEP cited ETC (Northeast Pipeline LLC) for sediment-laden discharges into waterways, improperly maintained erosion controls and failure to stabilize disturbed areas,” McDonnell said. “Disappointingly, many of these issues persist.”

Multiple inspections by DEP staff, most recently in January, found that Energy Transfer had not fulfilled the terms of the order and was not progressing toward compliance, the DEP said.

The DEP’s decision to withhold permits applies to ETC, Sunoco Pipeline LP, Energy Transfer and its subsidiaries.

The permit hold will not apply to any approvals needed for Energy Transfer to comply with the order, nor will it apply to mitigation and environmental restoration work along the Mariner East 2 pipeline, DEP spokesman Neil Shader said.

The hold will, however, affect the in-service date for the Revolution pipeline, a 24-inch natural gas gathering line that will service the Rover pipeline and Mariner East 2.

Energy Transfer’s pipelines in Pennsylvania include the Mariner East 1, 2 and 2X across southern Pennsylvania. The projects have drawn millions in fines and several temporary shutdown orders from state agencies.

Although Mariner East 2 was put into service in December, additional permit approvals are needed for pipeline infrastructure work, the DEP said. There are 27 approvals under review by DEP for Mariner East 2.

Energy Transfer spokeswoman Lisa Dillinger said the company is “committed to bringing this project into full compliance” with all environmental permits.

“This action does not affect the operation of any of our in-service pipelines or any areas of construction where permits have already been issued,” Dillinger said.

The Associated Press contributed to this report. Stephen Huba is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Stephen at 724-850-1280, [email protected] or via Twitter @shuba_trib.

Stephen Huba is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Stephen at 724-850-1280, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: News | Regional
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.