Blairsville woman escorting son to gate caught with gun at Pittsburgh airport | TribLIVE.com
Regional

Blairsville woman escorting son to gate caught with gun at Pittsburgh airport

Tom Davidson
1344306_web1_TSAairportPGH

A Blairsville woman had a loaded handgun in her purse Wednesday when she was escorting her son to a flight at Pittsburgh International Airport, authorities said.

The woman was stopped by Transportation Security Administration officers and was questioned by Allegheny County Police.

She was carrying a loaded 9 mm pistol in her purse, TSA officials said. The airline had given her a gate pass so she could escort her son to his gate.

It was the 15th gun stopped at a checkpoint at the airport this year. In 2018, the TSA reported there were 34 guns stopped at the airport’s checkpoint.

According to the TSA there were 4,239 firearms found at airport checkpoints across the nation — an average of more than 11 per day. It’s a 7% increase from the 3,957 guns found in 2017, according to the TSA.

Eighty-six percent of the guns were loaded and more than a third had a bullet in the chamber, the TSA said.

The typical penalty for a fire offence in $4,000 but the TSA can assess civil fines of up to $13,333 for firearms violations and criminal charges can be filed, the TSA said.

For information about how to legally travel with firearms, click here.

Tom Davidson is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tom at 724-226-4715, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Regional | Top Stories
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.