ShareThis Page
Cal U honored for voter engagement with Gen Z | TribLIVE.com
Regional

Cal U honored for voter engagement with Gen Z

Deb Erdley
| Friday, March 1, 2019 1:30 a.m
822682_web1_ptr-electionrig2-082316
Voting machine coordinator Barb Harkins works through a calibration screen on voting machines in an Allegheny County warehouse in Manchester Monday, August 22, 2016. Election worker calibrates voting machine

California University of Pennsylvania’s effort to engage Gen Z students in the electoral process is getting rave reviews.

The Fair Election Center’s Campus Vote Project recently named Cal U among the top 10 voter-friendly universities in Pennsylvania. This marks the second time the school has won the designation, first for its efforts in the 2016 election and now for its efforts last year.

Melanie Blumberg, a political science professor at school’s Washington County campus on the banks of the Monongahela River, said the school’s recent voter engagement campaigns fell under the auspices of the school’s American Democracy Project. The project, a civic engagement effort, dates to 2003.

Cal U ran voter registration drives beginning at orientation last fall and continued up through the last day to register for the fall 2018 election.

“We went all out for this election because we wanted to make the point that it isn’t just the presidential elections that are important,” Blumberg said.

Deb Erdley is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Deb at 412-320-7996, derdley@tribweb.com or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Regional
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.