California man sentenced for participation in tri-county drug ring | TribLIVE.com
Regional

California man sentenced for participation in tri-county drug ring

Patrick Varine
1454699_web1_WEB-fentanyl
Tribune-Review file
A member of a tri-county drug-trafficking ring was sentenced to a decade in prison on Tuesday, charged with bringing more than a kilogram of fentanyl into Western Pennsylvania for distribution.

One of a dozen people indicted as part of a Western Pennsylvania drug ring last November has been sentenced to a decade in prison.

Nikia Perkins, 44, of Bloomington, Calif., was sentenced on charges he conspired to distribute just over a kilogram of fentanyl, U.S. Attorney Scott Brady said in Pittsburgh on Wednesday.

According to information presented in court, Perkins was heard in a wiretapped phone call talking about drug transactions. Prosecutors proved that Perkins was responsible for bringing more than a kilo of fentanyl, along with an undisclosed amount of carfentanil — a synthetic fentanyl derivative that is exponentially more powerful — into Western Pennsylvania from overseas.

Perkins asked that he be allowed to serve his sentence in California.

The prosecution was part of a year-long investigation by the FBI’s Greater Pittsburgh Safe Streets Task Force into what its members called a large-scale drug trafficking organization operating in Beaver, Butler and Allegheny counties.

Patrick Varine is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Patrick at 724-850-2862, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Regional
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.