Case dropped against woman accused of threatening to kill Butler County DA | TribLIVE.com
Regional

Case dropped against woman accused of threatening to kill Butler County DA

Emily Balser
1538607_web1_GavelNewN

A former Butler County woman no longer is charged with threatening to kill Butler County District Attorney Rich Goldinger.

The state Attorney General’s Office on Tuesday dropped the case against Brittany Hartos, 27, formerly of Butler. One charge of terroristic threats remained in the case. Two other charges of aggravated assault and simple assault previously were dismissed.

According to court documents, Hartos was arrested and charged by state police in April after she called the National Crisis Hotline and allegedly threatened to kill Goldinger.

Deputy Attorney General Patrick Schulte said the case doesn’t meet the requirements to carry out the charge of terroristic threats. He said what Hartos was doing when talking to the National Crisis Hotline was considered to be “venting.” He said case law shows venting doesn’t meet the requirements of a terroristic threat charge.

“When we received all of the evidence that we had, this looked a lot like venting to us,” Schulte said. “It also looked like this woman did not have the capability of carrying out the threats.”

Schulte said Hartos also complied with the mental health treatment ordered by the courts.

Messages left for Goldinger, Hartos and Hartos’ lawyer, Victor Vouga, weren’t returned Wednesday.

Emily Balser is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Emily at 724-226-4680, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Regional
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.