ShareThis Page
Drug possession charges filed against Uniontown man in threats case | TribLIVE.com
Regional

Drug possession charges filed against Uniontown man in threats case

Paul Peirce
1026654_web1_police-lights

A Fayette County man who allegedly threatened his girlfriend and her five children with a handgun last month has also been accused by state police of possessing crack cocaine and marijuana.

Rasheme L. Jones, 38, of Uniontown, is charged with multiple counts of manufacturing and delivery of a controlled substance, possession of a controlled substance and possession of drug paraphernalia, as well as five counts of child endangerment in connection with the March 2 incident.

He was arraigned Friday before District Judge Michael Metros and ordered held in the county prison after failing to post $150,000 bail pending a preliminary hearing April 24.

State police in Uniontown said troopers were summoned to Jones’ girlfriend’s apartment on the 100 block of Morgatown Street at 6:47 a.m. March 2 after receiving a call that Jones was actively threatening his girlfriend and her five children with a firearm.

When police arrived, Trooper Ronald Harris said they found the children unharmed. Police said Jones was taken into custody outside the residence as he attempted to flee. Harris said in court documents police discovered Jones was in possession of crack cocaine and marijuana.

Troopers returned to the residence later with a search warrant and seized multiple prescription pills, two electronic digital scales with cocaine residue on them, three cellular telephones, marijuana smoking pipes, a glass bong, numerous plastic baggies and a “Night Owl” surveillance system.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul at 724-850-2860, ppeirce@tribweb.com or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Regional
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.