ShareThis Page
Cops: Speed, alcohol likely contributed to fatal Fayette County crash | TribLIVE.com
Regional

Cops: Speed, alcohol likely contributed to fatal Fayette County crash

Paul Peirce
| Friday, March 1, 2019 1:30 a.m
821810_web1_Ambulance2

State police in Uniontown said speed and alcohol are believed to have been contributing factors in a single-vehicle crash late Wednesday that killed a 62-year-old Fayette County woman and seriously injured her husband in Menallen Township.

Deborah K. Kaider of New Salem, who was a passenger in a 2015 Chrysler driven by her husband, Victor, died from her injuries at Uniontown Hospital where she was taken for treatment after the 11:24 p.m. crash. Victor Kaider, 65, is being treated for serious injuries at Ruby Memorial Hospital in Morgantown, police said.

Trooper Joshua Wiskeman reported Kaider was driving at a high rate of speed in the 1000 block of New Salem Road when he lost control and drove off the highway, striking a utility pole and crashing through several metal fences.

The coroner’s office said Dearth Funeral Home in New Salem is in charge of arrangements.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul at 724-850-2860, ppeirce@tribweb.com or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Regional
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.