Diabetes remains prevalent in Western Pennsylvania despite steep drop nationwide | TribLIVE.com

Diabetes remains prevalent in Western Pennsylvania despite steep drop nationwide

Emily Balser
A new study shows the incidences of type 2 diabetes are decreasing nationwide.

Pittsburgh doctors say Type 2 diabetes continues to be prevalent in Western Pennsylvania despite the findings of a new study that shows incidences of the disease are decreasing nationwide.

The study was published in the health journal BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care in May. It shows a roughly 35% decrease in diabetes incidences in the United States to the lowest level in nearly 20 years.

The decrease comes despite no change in obesity trends, which is one of the leading causes of the disease. The study looked at data from 1980 to 2017 that was collected through the National Health Interview Survey.

“We’re not seeing a decline in the number of patients we’re seeing,” said Dr. Jennifer Pennock, an endocrinologist with Allegheny Health Network. “We still have a lot of new patients with diabetes being diagnosed.”

Robin Jennings, a spokeswoman with Excela Health, said doctors aren’t seeing a decline in Westmoreland County, either.

“What we’re seeing within our patient population is a continued rise,” she said. “It remains prevalent in our area.”

Doctors said there are a number of reasons the nationwide data could be showing a decrease. One of those reasons is earlier detection and the creation of the prediabetes diagnosis, which is identified when patients show indicators they may develop diabetes down the road.

The prediabetes diagnosis gives them more time to decrease their risk by making exercise and diet improvements, said Dr. Jason Ng, an assistant professor of medicine in the division of endocrinology and metabolism with the University of Pittsburgh department of medicine.

“People are more aggressive with treatment of prediabetes,” he said.

Pennock said adding about 150 minutes of exercise per week has been shown to reduce a patient’s diabetes risk.

“Walking is enough to reduce risk,” she said. “Five to 10% of body weight loss is enough to reduce risk of diabetes.”

Newer medications could also play a factor in slowing the progression of diabetes.

“That’s only slowing the progression, and that’s not stopping it,” Ng said. “Maybe we delay it five to 10 years.”

Another reason for the apparent decrease, Ng said, is simply because the number of cases went up so drastically in the late 1990s and early 2000s because of the American Diabetes Association’s lowering the fasting glucose level for a diagnosis. That may have caused an unusual spike in cases.

“At the same time, you saw that the explosion of sugary drinks and stuff like that also shot up during the 1990s and into the 2000s a little bit,” he said. “I think starting in the mid-2000s, (we) saw a lot of change in that thinking.”

Ng said being diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes is not to be taken lightly by patients.

“When you get diagnosed with diabetes, you get the same risk of having a heart attack as somebody who had a heart attack before and was not a diabetic,” he said. “It’s serious. Long-term complications can include losing your kidneys, eyesight goes … (and) significant nerve damage.”

Emily Balser is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Emily at 724-226-4680, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.