East Pittsburgh man arrested, accused of 2017 rape at Indiana University of Pennsylvania | TribLIVE.com
Regional

East Pittsburgh man arrested, accused of 2017 rape at Indiana University of Pennsylvania

Stephen Huba
1349243_web1_ptr-RobinsonVearnonBACKGROUND-062819

An East Pittsburgh man wanted for a 2017 rape at Indiana University of Pennsylvania was arrested Thursday in East Pittsburgh.

Donte Robinson-Vearnon, 20, was apprehended at an apartment in the 500 block of Grandview Avenue in East Pittsburgh shortly after 6 p.m. Allegheny County sheriff’s deputies forced their way into the apartment and found Robinson-Vernon hiding in a bedroom, according to a release from the sheriff’s office.

They arrested him without further incident and booked him at the Allegheny County Jail in Pittsburgh, where he awaits arraignment on an arrest warrant out of Indiana County.

Robinson-Vernon is accused of raping a woman at IUP in October 2017. He has been wanted by authorities since March 20, when the arrest warrant was issued.

He faces charges of rape of an unconscious victim, involuntary deviate sexual intercourse of an unconscious victim, sexual assault, aggravated indecent assault without consent of others and aggravated indecent assault of an unconscious person, the sheriff’s office said.

Robinson-Vearnon also was wanted on an Allegheny County bench warrant for failing to appear at a preliminary hearing regarding a drug charge originating in McKeesport.

Stephen Huba is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Stephen at 724-850-1280, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.