ShareThis Page
Fayette County man admits to owning 1,189 images of child pornography | TribLIVE.com
Regional

Fayette County man admits to owning 1,189 images of child pornography

Paul Peirce
1072388_web1_WEB-pittsburgh-federal-court-building

A Uniontown man pleaded guilty in U.S. District Court Wednesday to possessing materials depicting the sexual exploitation of minors after investigators confiscated his computers containing 1,189 downloaded images of child pornography.

U.S. Attorney Scott W. Brady said Jason A. Early, 41, pleaded guilty to one count before Senior Judge Donetta Ambrose.

Department of Homeland Security Investigations were led to Early as part of a nationwide crackdown by the U.S. Justice Department on the sharing of child pornography.

Investigators executed a search warrant at Early’s residence in 2017 and a forensic review of his devices revealed 1,181 images and videos depicting child pornography, including images and videos of toddlers 2 or 3 years of age, as well as bondage, according to the complaint.

Early admitted to viewing pornography through peer-to-peer programs and admitted having downloaded images on his MacBook and on two external hard drives.

Ambrose scheduled sentencing for Aug. 22.

Brady said the law provides for a maximum sentence of not more than 10 years in prison, a fine of not more than $250,000, or both.

Pending sentencing, Ambrose continued Early’s unsecured $50,000 bond.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul at 724-850-2860, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Regional | Top Stories
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.