5 Western Pennsylvania nursing homes among the nation’s most troubled | TribLIVE.com
Regional

5 Western Pennsylvania nursing homes among the nation’s most troubled

Deb Erdley
1250047_web1_1247909-36aff3e9bc1b443a898005fb478ac844
Associated Press
Four nursing homes in Westmoreland County and one in Allegheny County are either under federal oversight reserved for nation’s most troubled skilled care centers or are on a waiting list for such oversight, according to a new U.S. Senate report.

What regulators called a “persistent record of poor care” landed two Westmoreland County nursing homes and a third in Allegheny County on a waiting list as candidates for special government oversight reserved for the nation’s worst skilled care centers.

The Special Focus Facility program, which scrutinizes some of the nation’s most-troubled centers, can oversee 88 nursing homes at a time. There are four Pennsylvania homes in the category that carries a public warning label, including the Twin Lakes Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center in Greensburg, with 137 beds, and The Grove at North Huntingdon, with 120 beds.

New facilities can be added to the list only when a facility closes or has improved sufficiently to be removed.

This week, the public learned two other Westmoreland County nursing homes and a Pittsburgh facility are among 16 Pennsylvania nursing homes considered candidates for the program: The Grove at Latrobe; the William Penn Care Center in Penn Township; and the Corner View Nursing and Rehabilitation Center in Pittsburgh’s Homewood neighborhood.

That list of candidates for Special Focus oversight, which includes 400 of the nation’s 15,700 nursing homes, was made public after the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) released them at the request of Pennsylvania’s U.S. Sens. Bob Casey, D-Scranton, and Pat Toomey, R-Lehigh Valley.

The list includes homes that state inspectors have cited repeatedly as having serious health, safety or sanitary problems, officials said.

Casey and Toomey said the public should have access to information about all of the homes, including candidates waiting for oversight.

“Despite being indistinguishable from (special focus nursing homes) in terms of their qualifications, candidates are not publicly disclosed,” they said in their report, titled “Families’ and Residents’ Right to Know: Uncovering Poor Care in America’s Nursing Homes.”

In a letter last month to Casey, CMS Administrator Seema Verma singled out federal budget problems as a factor limiting oversight.

“The total number of (special focus) slots and total number of (special focus) candidates nationally are based on the availability of federal resources,” Verma wrote. She said as recently as 2010, there was room for 167 nursing homes in the special focus program and 835 candidates. That’s now down to 88 special focus slots and 440 candidates.

The senators were adamant information about such facilities be made public.

“We’ve got to make sure any family member or any potential resident of a nursing home can get this information, not only ahead of time but on an ongoing basis,” Casey said.

“When a family makes the hard decision to seek nursing home services for a loved one, they deserve to know if a facility under consideration suffers from systemic shortcomings,” Toomey said.

About 1.3 million Americans are nursing home residents, cared for in more than 15,700 facilities. The senators’ report said problem nursing homes on both lists represent only about 3% of them.

Administrators at the North Huntingdon and Twin Lakes facilities did not return calls for comment, nor did executives at the Latrobe or Penn Township nursing homes listed as candidates for oversight.

But Rodney Brooks, nursing home administrator at the Corner View Nursing and Rehabilitation Center in Homewood, said the care team at the 187-bed facility in the former Pittsburgh Hospital building has been working to improve its rating. He hopes their work will lift the Allegheny County facility from the list.

“The history of this building is such that it has always been a challenge, but we have turned things around and cut our complaints by the Health Department by about 90% from last year,” he said. “We’ve built a better team, and we’re working very hard to get this building back to where it should be.”

Advocates have long been concerned about the lack of public disclosure regarding nursing homes, said Kathy Cubit, director of advocacy at the Center for Advocacy for the Rights and Interests of the Elderly in Philadelphia.

“Especially when you have tools like Nursing Home Compare on the CMS website, it should be disclosed,” she said.

Westmoreland County Commissioner Ted Kopas said he was alarmed to hear facilities in the county are on the list.

“It is certainly disappointing and alarming because we’re a pretty close-knit community in Westmoreland County. I think all of us have a family member or a relative or know someone in one of these homes,” Kopas said.

He said he was happy and relieved to see Westmoreland Manor, the county’s 400-plus bed nursing home, was not on either list.

State Sen. Kim Ward, R-Hempfield, said she’s outraged that nursing homes in her district have failed to the point of being placed into Special Facilities Focus status or earned a spot on its waiting list.

“When I think of the families who did their due diligence and put their sacred trust for their loved ones in these nursing homes but couldn’t get this information, it makes me mad. Here you have a home that was cited nine times in two years. I think if they’re not going to take proper care of people, they shouldn’t be reimbursed,” she said.

Deb Erdley is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Deb at 724-850-1209, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Regional | Top Stories
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.