ShareThis Page
Former West Virginia state trooper indicted for using excessive force on fleeing teen | TribLIVE.com
Regional

Former West Virginia state trooper indicted for using excessive force on fleeing teen

Paul Peirce
913104_web1_GavelNewN

A former West Virginia state trooper was indicted Wednesday by a federal grand jury in Martinsburg, W.Va., for using excessive force on a 16-year-old after a pursuit last November.

Michael Kennedy, 29, of Morgantown, was named in a one-count indictment accusing him of deprivation of civil rights, according to Assistant Attorney General Eric Dreiband for the Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division and U.S. Attorney William J. Powell of the Northern District of West Virginia.

Kennedy was among several officers disciplined after the arrest of a 16-year-old on Nov. 19, 2018, in Berkeley County, according to news reports.

He and another trooper, Derek Walker, were fired in January after an agency review of the incident, as were two sheriff’s deputies.

The Department of Justice reported the teenager allegedly struck a sheriff’s vehicle with his car, drove off and hit a telephone pole and rolled over. Officers pulled him out of the car and assaulted him, prosecutors said.

The incident was captured by dashcam, according to news reports.

The case was investigated by the FBI.

Kennedy is due in court for arraignment on April 8, according to Powell.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul at 724-850-2860, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Regional
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.