ShareThis Page
4 Southwestern Pa. trails could be part of coast-to-coast bike route | TribLIVE.com
Regional

4 Southwestern Pa. trails could be part of coast-to-coast bike route

Jacob Tierney
1137887_web1_gtr-lo-GAP002-082818
A biker makes his way along the Great Allegheny Passage in West Newton, on Monday, Aug. 27, 2018.

Four Southwestern Pennsylvania bike paths eventually could be part of a coast-to-coast mega-trail.

The Great American Rail-Trail, proposed by the nonprofit Rails-to-Trails Conservancy, would link Seattle to Washington D.C. with 3,700 miles spanning 12 states.

The conservancy has announced its preferred route for the trail, which would link up dozens of existing trails — including four in Pennsylvania.

The Panhandle Trail connects Weirton, W.Va., to McDonald, Washington County.

The Montour trail continues from McDonald to Coraopolis.

There’s a gap from Coraopolis to Pittsburgh, where the Three Rivers Heritage Trail connects riders to the Great Allegheny Passage — which runs from Pittsburgh to Cumberland, Md.

“Washington County is seeing a direct return in its vibrant tourism industry, and our trail systems provide a unique opportunity to capitalize on trail tourism and its impact on small business growth,” Larry Maggi, Washington County commissioner chairman, said in a statement.

Thanks to the many existing bike paths on the route, the Great American Rail-Trail is more than half-complete. Finishing the full coast-to-coast route, however, will require building 1,700 miles of new trails to fill in the gaps.

The Rails-to-Trails Conservancy has been working on the project since the late 1980s, and finishing will likely take several more decades, the organization said.

Jacob Tierney is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jacob at 724-836-6646, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Regional
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.