ShareThis Page
Free well, spring water testing available through Duquesne University study | TribLIVE.com
Regional

Free well, spring water testing available through Duquesne University study

Tony LaRussa
737417_web1_WEB-water-well

Pittsburgh area residents who rely on wells or natural springs can get a free test of their water’s quality.

The tests are being done as part of a research study by Duquesne University professor John F. Stolz, who is creating a map of water well and spring locations throughout the area to try to identify sources and pathways of contamination.

In addition to testing the water, residents will be asked to complete a survey that includes questions about the type of well they use, its depth, quantity and quality of water and whether any changes have occurred during the past several years.

Water samples from the well or spring will be tested on site as well as sent to a lab for additional analysis. GPS coordinates for the well and spring also will be recorded.

The testing process will take about 30 minutes to complete. A summary and explanation of the test results will be mailed once the analysis is completed, which typically takes about six to eight weeks.

All information that is collected will be kept confidential — participants will not be identified in the reports or study information that is released.

To participate in the testing, send an email to graduate research assistant Dannielle Pratt at: prattd@duq.edu.

Tony LaRussa is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tony at 724-772-6368, tlarussa@tribweb.com or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Regional
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.