ShareThis Page
Ice jams clear the Allegheny River but rain prompts flood warnings |

Ice jams clear the Allegheny River but rain prompts flood warnings

Mary Ann Thomas
Courtesy of the National Weather Service
An ice jam north of Kittanning on the Allegheny River, shown here in late January, was gone by Monday.

The ice jams have cleared on the Allegheny River in Armstrong County, however, rain has triggered flood warnings and watches in the region.

The Army Corps of Engineers reported Monday that ice jam on the Allegheny River in the upper reaches of Armstrong County late last week has melted. The Corps are sending a team of engineers to assess damage to the locks and dams at Mosgrove and Rimer.

The entire Pittsburgh area is under a flood watch for small streams spilling over their banks in low lying areas with 1.5 to 2 inches of rainpredicted from Monday night through Tuesday, according to Pat Herald, meteorologist for the National Weather Service.

A river flood warning has been issued along the Monongahela River in Elizabeth and Charleroi. The Mon wharf is expected to flood, when water rises above 18 feet Tuesday at 5 p.m. Then, Wednesday morning at Pittsburgh’s Point, the Ohio River will approach 22 feet, closing the 10th Street Bypass, according to Herald.

Mary Ann Thomas is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Mary at 724-226-4691, or via Twitter .

Categories: News | Regional
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.