Inmate accused of smuggling Suboxone, assault at SCI Somerset | TribLIVE.com
Regional

Inmate accused of smuggling Suboxone, assault at SCI Somerset

Paul Peirce
1646787_web1_web_jail

A 32-year-old inmate at state prison in Somerset already serving a life sentence for murder was charged by state police with assaulting a corrections officer who broke up an alleged drug smuggling attempt in the prison’s visitation area last month.

Marcus L. Graham, 32, formerly of Reading, Berks County, has been charged in Somerset County with assault of a corrections officer, manufacturing and delivery of a controlled substance, aggravated assault, simple assault and possession of contraband by an inmate.

Graham is serving a life sentence after admitting to the 2005 kidnapping and murder of a 22-year-old man in order to steal his $3,200 life savings, according to court records.

Trooper John Wogan said Graham’s accomplice in the smuggling attempt, Geneva I. Debooth, 50, also of Reading, was also charged manufacturing and delivery of a controlled substance, possession of a controlled substance and possession of drug paraphernalia.

Wogan alleges in a complaint filed before Confluence District Judge Sandra Stevanus that Graham was caught attempting to have a drug package containing Suboxone passed to him during a visit by Debooth. Wogan said the transaction was caught on the prison’s video surveillance cameras.

Suboxone is a drug used to treat opioid addiction.

When a 47-year-old corrections officer, who was not identified in police reports, attempted to break up the transaction, Wogan said Graham assaulted the officer. Police said the guard suffered minor injuries.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul at 724-850-2860, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Regional
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.