Cops: Sandwich wasn’t enough — inmate attacked for not giving up cookie, banana |

Cops: Sandwich wasn’t enough — inmate attacked for not giving up cookie, banana

Paul Peirce
Indiana County Court House

Everybody knows that the cookie is always the best part of a bagged lunch.

So, when one inmate wouldn’t give his up to another inmate, you can imagine what happened next.

Or maybe you can’t.

An Indiana County inmate, who had already handed over his sandwich, refused to part with a banana and cookie in his lunch Friday and that caused another inmate to attack him inside a holding cell of the county courthouse, police said.

Ryshawn Crawford, 18, of Philadelphia, was charged by borough police with assault on a prisoner, harassment, simple assault and strangulation in connection with the fight that occurred about, well, lunchtime. The fight was broken up by sheriff’s deputies.

Crawford, an inmate at nearby SCI Pine Grove, is accused of assaulting Indiana County Jail inmate David Bratcher, 35, of Alverda.

According to borough Officer Leroy Anderson Jr., Bratcher brought a bagged lunch into the holding cell from the county jail where he is incarcerated on a DUI-related charge. Anderson said Crawford wanted the lunch and Bratcher gave him the sandwich. Anderson said Crawford assaulted Bratcher after he refused to give Crawford the cookie and banana.

Crawford is serving a five-year state prison sentence after a 2018 conviction for robbery conspiracy in Upper Darby, Delaware County. He was at the courthouse in Indiana on two unrelated prisoner harassment complaints at the state prison earlier this year.

Bratcher did not require medical attention.

A preliminary hearing will be scheduled before Indiana County District Judge Guy Haberl.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul at 724-850-2860, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Regional | Top Stories
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.