Investigation into officers that shot former Canon-Mac wrestler wrapping up |

Investigation into officers that shot former Canon-Mac wrestler wrapping up

Paul Guggenheimer
Logan B. Macri won a state wrestling championship in 2018 while at Canon-McMillan High School.

An investigation into the officers that shot former Canon-McMillan wrestler Logan Macri is expected to wrap up early next week, Washington County District Attorney Eugene Vittone said.

Macri is recovering at UPMC Presbyterian.

Cpl. Sarah Teagarden, a state police spokeswoman, said a warrant for his arrest has been obtained, and Macri will be arraigned once he’s medically cleared.

Police shot Macri, a 2018 state high school wrestling champion, multiple times on April 14 after they were called to his house in North Strabane for a report of a domestic assault.

Officers from North Strabane and Canonsburg found Macri outside brandishing a firearm. While they were attempting to take him into custody, Macri pointed an AR-15 rifle at the approaching officers, according to a criminal complaint filed against him. Officers shot, striking Macri several times, the report said.

All of the officers involved in the initial call are on administrative leave while state police have been conducting their investigation.

Paul Guggenheimer is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul at 724-226-7706 or [email protected].

Categories: Local | Regional
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.