Judge puts hold on next week’s Sandusky re-sentencing | TribLIVE.com
Regional

Judge puts hold on next week’s Sandusky re-sentencing

Associated Press
1682172_web1_ptr-jerrysandusky-072519
AP
In this Oct. 29, 2015 photo Former Penn State University assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky, center, arrives at the Centre County Courthouse for a hearing about his appeal on his child sex-abuse conviction, in Bellefonte, Pa. Penn State stands to collect hundreds of thousands of dollars from the defunct charity for children founded by Sandusky to settle claims that were never fleshed out in a civil lawsuit.

BELLEFONTE — Jerry Sandusky’s resentencing on a 45-count child sexual abuse conviction is on hold and it’s not clear when it will occur.

Judge John Foradora issued a short order on Monday saying the Sept. 23 proceeding won’t take place as scheduled.

Sandusky was sentenced to 30 to 60 years after his 2012 jury conviction, but an appeals court ruled in February that mandatory minimums had been improperly applied.

Sandusky defense lawyer Al Lindsay declined comment on the reason for the judge’s order.

Sandusky, a former Penn State assistant football coach, was convicted of the sexual abuse of 10 boys, including attacks on campus.

Categories: Local | Regional
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.